Military Application Resilience
Emulating real-world network conditions to verify applications & systems
At WSTS 2026, Adam Paterson, Head of Product Management at Calnex Solutions, made the case that telecom – as one of the world’s most demanding critical infrastructures – has spent years solving some of the key timing problems that aerospace and defense are grappling with right now.
Modern military platforms depend on precise time across a wide range of systems: navigation, guidance, electronic intelligence, surveillance and detection, IFF systems, synthetic aperture systems, and electronic countermeasures. Each has its own requirements – and each can fail in distinct ways when synchronization goes wrong.
Timing is also a security function. Time drift creates openings for malicious actors – enabling them to insert false information, delay emergency signals, interfere with industrial controllers, or launch denial-of-service attacks. Robust time awareness closes those loopholes.
Aerospace and defense also introduce challenges that simply don’t exist in commercial telecom – covert operation requirements, moving platforms operating in contested or denied environments, and resilience requirements that take precedence over raw performance.
Telecom has faced sustained pressure to build timing systems that don’t fail – under network disruption, GNSS outage, and deliberate attack. Several translate directly to defense and aerospace:
These aren’t theoretical – they’re proven, deployed at scale, and continuously evolving.
The convergence of requirements across telecom, aerospace, and defense creates a real opportunity. Standards like PTP are already shared. 5G network slicing allows infrastructure to serve multiple demanding use cases. And telecom’s commercial scale means technologies benefit from investment and iteration that these sectors cannot match on their own – with corresponding economies of scale.
But dual use has limits. Defense often reverses telecom’s priority ordering – resilience over performance, security over openness. For security-critical components, there is a clear preference for disaggregated solutions that allow in-house ownership, reducing dependence on commercial supply chains.
The right approach is selective adoption: take what telecom has proven, adapt it – don’t assume a straight transplant will work.
Both industries are evolving simultaneously. Telecom continues to innovate under the demands of 5G, AI, and distributed infrastructure. Aerospace and defense face increasing urgency around timing resilience as the threat environment intensifies. The conditions for cross-industry learning have rarely been better.
![]() |
About the AuthorAdam has over 15 years’ experience in the Test and Measurement business and is Head of Product Management at Calnex Solutions. He presented “How Can Aerospace and Defense Benefit from Telecom?” at WSTS 2026. |
