Getting Into the Hotel Business

The protocol for the fronthaul interface was specified in the Common Public Radio Interface (CRPI), produced by an industry consortium consisting of Alcatel-Lucent, Ericsson, Huawei, NEC and Nokia. Since CPRI is carried over a fibre connection, it was realised that this fibre might be considerably longer than the height of a tower, freeing the mobile operator from having to place the baseband unit (BBU) at the antenna location. This is particularly attractive for dense urban locations where there might be several antennas within a small area.

Deployments were created consisting of several BBUs (Baseband Units) co-located in a central office known as a “baseband hotel”, and connected to RRUs (Remote Radio Units) using CPRI over dark fibre. This deployment style became known as C-RAN (Centralized Radio Access Network) – not to be confused with the Cloud RAN concept, which I will cover in the next post. It simplified the backhaul networks, because several BBUs could be co-located together and served by a common, high-bandwidth connection. It also simplified synchronization, because all these BBUs could be served by the same time and frequency reference, guaranteeing accurate synchronization.

Provided the latency of the fibre connection to the RRUs was known accurately, the baseband units could schedule transmission of the radio frames such that at each antenna (the timing reference point), the radio frames would align with those from other antennas. Synchronization then becomes more of a latency management issue rather than a distributed network synchronization problem.

The downside of the C-RAN architecture was that the fronthaul connections themselves required dark fibre. This is costly to install, and prevents sharing of fibres. Secondly, the CPRI protocols limit the maximum distance between the BBU and RRU to a few kilometres, which reduces the economies of scale provided by the baseband hotel concept. Therefore the original C-RAN concept didn’t see much take-up for LTE deployments.

Keep a lookout for my follow-up blogs, appearing weekly.

  • Networking the fronthaul.
  • Synchronization requirements for fronthaul.
  • Synchronization methods in fronthaul.
  • Testing synchronization in fronthaul.

Tim Frost
Strategic Technology Manager, Calnex Solutions.

Recent Blogs

Related Blogs

banana skin

Will SD-WAN really be the savior?

Mar 13, 2019
The only way to prove it is to get validation on how it will perform against your needs…
1415 Read more
Four Boardroom Members

How to Optimise Your IT Network and Spend

Feb 06, 2019
Network emulation can be a key tool to overcome barriers in getting the most out of your…
2352 Read more

Responding to IT Network Issues

Jan 22, 2019
If simple remedial scripts are not enough to fix an IT network issue, a more…
3604 Read more

Archived Blogs

848 More

Timing not Telecoms

Nov 08, 2016
575 More

5G Coming Soon

Aug 22, 2016
580 More

What is 1588 PTP?

Aug 04, 2016
694 More

5G on the Horizon

Aug 01, 2016
573 More
612 More

What is a PTP Clock?

Apr 09, 2016
720 More

What is Time Error?

Oct 21, 2015
589 More

LTE-A & VoLTE Rollout

Sep 22, 2015
572 More

LTE Picks Up Speed

Aug 22, 2015
556 More

What is the Time?

Aug 22, 2015
565 More

Mobile and Sync

Aug 22, 2015
534 More

What is SyncE?

Aug 22, 2015
1036 More
622 More

Microwave Update

Aug 22, 2015
608 More

Unravelling Standards

Aug 22, 2015
594 More

Partial Progress?

Aug 22, 2015
562 More

Interpreting ITU

Aug 22, 2015
544 More

Confusion Rules!

Aug 22, 2015
571 More

Basestations Need Sync

Aug 22, 2015
579 More

ITSF 2015 Edinburgh

Aug 22, 2015
548 More

India to Follow China?

Aug 07, 2015
564 More

Click your area of interest below for more tutorials and real-world case studies.