Getting Into the Hotel Business

The protocol for the fronthaul interface was specified in the Common Public Radio Interface (CRPI), produced by an industry consortium consisting of Alcatel-Lucent, Ericsson, Huawei, NEC and Nokia. Since CPRI is carried over a fibre connection, it was realised that this fibre might be considerably longer than the height of a tower, freeing the mobile operator from having to place the baseband unit (BBU) at the antenna location. This is particularly attractive for dense urban locations where there might be several antennas within a small area.

Deployments were created consisting of several BBUs (Baseband Units) co-located in a central office known as a “baseband hotel”, and connected to RRUs (Remote Radio Units) using CPRI over dark fibre. This deployment style became known as C-RAN (Centralized Radio Access Network) – not to be confused with the Cloud RAN concept, which I will cover in the next post. It simplified the backhaul networks, because several BBUs could be co-located together and served by a common, high-bandwidth connection. It also simplified synchronization, because all these BBUs could be served by the same time and frequency reference, guaranteeing accurate synchronization.

Provided the latency of the fibre connection to the RRUs was known accurately, the baseband units could schedule transmission of the radio frames such that at each antenna (the timing reference point), the radio frames would align with those from other antennas. Synchronization then becomes more of a latency management issue rather than a distributed network synchronization problem.

The downside of the C-RAN architecture was that the fronthaul connections themselves required dark fibre. This is costly to install, and prevents sharing of fibres. Secondly, the CPRI protocols limit the maximum distance between the BBU and RRU to a few kilometres, which reduces the economies of scale provided by the baseband hotel concept. Therefore the original C-RAN concept didn’t see much take-up for LTE deployments.

Keep a lookout for my follow-up blogs, appearing weekly.

  • Networking the fronthaul.
  • Synchronization requirements for fronthaul.
  • Synchronization methods in fronthaul.
  • Testing synchronization in fronthaul.

Tim Frost
Strategic Technology Manager, Calnex Solutions.

Recent Blogs

Related Blogs

Four Boardroom Members

How to Optimise Your IT Network and Spend

Feb 06, 2019
Network emulation can be a key tool to overcome barriers in getting the most out of your…
3919 Read more

Responding to IT Network Issues

Jan 22, 2019
If simple remedial scripts are not enough to fix an IT network issue, a more…
4583 Read more

Keeping Audiences 'In the Moment'

Nov 16, 2018
Today’s broadcast audiences are seeking more. They want user defined, on demand content.…
1469 Read more

Archived Blogs

1212 More
1450 More

Timing not Telecoms

Nov 08, 2016
948 More

5G Coming Soon

Aug 22, 2016
973 More

What is 1588 PTP?

Aug 04, 2016
1207 More

5G on the Horizon

Aug 01, 2016
971 More
992 More

What is a PTP Clock?

Apr 09, 2016
1202 More

What is Time Error?

Oct 21, 2015
970 More

LTE-A & VoLTE Rollout

Sep 22, 2015
945 More

LTE Picks Up Speed

Aug 22, 2015
915 More

What is the Time?

Aug 22, 2015
945 More

Mobile and Sync

Aug 22, 2015
909 More

What is SyncE?

Aug 22, 2015
1837 More
1028 More

Microwave Update

Aug 22, 2015
1015 More

Unravelling Standards

Aug 22, 2015
980 More

Partial Progress?

Aug 22, 2015
923 More

Interpreting ITU

Aug 22, 2015
919 More

Confusion Rules!

Aug 22, 2015
966 More

Basestations Need Sync

Aug 22, 2015
962 More

ITSF 2015 Edinburgh

Aug 22, 2015
909 More

India to Follow China?

Aug 07, 2015
926 More

Click your area of interest below for more tutorials and real-world case studies.